Skip to main content
· 1/21/1997

Coonley v. Fortis Benefit Insurance

Citations

  • 956 F. Supp. 841
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1050
  • 1997 WL 37043

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where the plan is silent as to the definition of “employee,” it is reasonable to assume that the same definition as is applicable to who is an “employee” under the ERISA statute would apply under an ERISA plan

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bennett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.