· 1/21/1997
Coonley v. Fortis Benefit Insurance
Citations
- 956 F. Supp. 841
- 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1050
- 1997 WL 37043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that where the plan is silent as to the definition of “employee,” it is reasonable to assume that the same definition as is applicable to who is an “employee” under the ERISA statute would apply under an ERISA plan
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bennett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.