Jacob G. v. Savanah F.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing expert testimony that defendant’s actions did not breach standard of care in legal malpractice case
• “[A] pleader may assert contradictory statements of fact only when legitimately in doubt about the facts in question.”
• “The main issue on appeal is ... whether the district court correctly ruled that Galvin’s conduct was malpractice as a matter of law.”
• “A lawyer does not buy immunity from a malpractice suit by hiring an expert to call his pratfalls ‘strategic.’ ”
• in legal malpractice case under Indiana law, expert testimony is normally required to show standard of care
• “[A] pleader may assert contradictory statements of fact only when legitimately in doubt about the facts in question.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).