Rhodes v. Erion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding no abuse of discretion to refuse to reduce a Rule 68 award under Rule 82(b)(3)(K) when appellant failed to meet the \manifestly unjust\ standard
• stating \that whether [defendant] spent more on her defense than the amount in controversy is not dispositive\ when determining whether attorney's fees award should be reduced
• stating \that whether Erion spent more on her defense than the amount in controversy is not dispositive\ when determining whether an attorney's fees award should be reduced
• holding equal protection argument waived
• “[A]wards of attorney’s fees made pursuant to the schedule set out in Rule 82 are presumptively correct, and the superior court need not make any findings in support of the award.”
• stating abuse of discretion standard for reviewing attorney’s fees awards

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).