Skip to main content

Strother v. State

Citations

  • 891 P.2d 214
  • 1995 Alas. App. LEXIS 8
  • 1995 WL 87219

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the defendant violated his spouse’s right to joint custody when, among other things, “for several weeks he was successful in keeping both his own whereabouts and the child’s whereabouts hidden from his wife”
  • “The crime [of custodial interference] does not focus on the legal status of the defendant, but rather focuses on the defendant’s actions, the effect of the defendant’s actions, and the intent with which those actions were performed.”
  • The court held that tire statute embodied the rule that when parents are joint custodians, neither parent can take exclusive physical custody of the child in a manner defeating the rights of the other parent.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryner, Coats, Mannheimer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.