State v. West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The focus of the custodial interference statute was to protect the rights and interests of the victims, i.e., the child and the lawful custodian; the focus was not on the legal status of the one who does the taking.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Strother v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1995-03-03· cited 23×
• State v. Wootten
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-07· cited 6×
• In re the Marriage of Wittke
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1987-06-10· cited 3×
• State v. Fitouri
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1995-04-12· cited 2×
• Perrin v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2003-03-21· cited 2×
• State v. Gambone
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1988-10-26· cited 2×
• State v. Renfro
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2008-10-03· cited 1×
• State v. District Court
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-07-17
• Jacob G. v. Savanah F.
  Alaska Supreme Court· 2024-03-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Matter of Marriage of Jenks
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-12-21· cited 70×
• People v. Harrison
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-03-20· cited 18×
• In Re the Marriage of Jenks
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1982-02-08· cited 6×