State v. Parish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “ ‘an erroneous instruction cannot be cured by a subsequent correct one’ ”
• holding that \`an erroneous instruction cannot be cured by a subsequent correct one'\
• holding that a self-defense instruction is warranted when the facts are “sufficient to raise a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to whether or not the defendant acted in self-defense”
• explaining that reversible error review only asks whether “a reasonable juror would have been confused or misdirected”
• stating that reversible error arises when “a reasonable juror would have been confused or misdirected”
• indicating that excuse or justification ought to be decided by the factfinder when the evidence permits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).