United States v. Jayyousi

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a lay witness’s testimony was admissible even though “he did not personally observe or participate in the defendants’ conversations”
• holding that terrorism enhancement under § 3A1.4 applies when purpose of defendants’ activity is calculated to promote a terrorism crime regardless of defendants’ personal motivations
• holding that terrorism enhancement under § 3A1.4 applies when purpose of defendants’ activity is calculated to promote a terrorism crime regardless of defendants’ personal motivations
• holding that terrorism enhancement under § 3A1.4 applies when purpose of defendants’ activity is calculated to promote a terrorism crime regardless of defendants’ personal motivations
• holding that terrorism enhancement under § 3A1.4 applies when purpose of defendants’ activity is calculated to promote a terrorism crime regardless of defendants’ personal motivations
• holding that a 208-month sentence, which represented a downward variance of 42%, was substantively unreasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).