Grumman Data Systems Corporation v. John H. Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, and Intergraph Corporation, Intervenor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• demonstrating that the Court first looks to whether the language of an agreement is ambiguous or unambiguous
• demonstrating that the Court first looks to whether the language of an agreement is ambiguous or unambiguous
• noting that de minimis errors in the procurement process do not justify relief
• asserting that “interpretation of a contract provision is a question of law”
• finding an ambiguity patent when the “agency’s answer [was] susceptible to more than one meaning on its face”
• “This court . . . must afford great deference to agencies’ decisions in relation to procurement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).