Skip to main content

Irizarry v. State

Citations

  • 905 So. 2d 160
  • 2005 WL 293082

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that double jeopardy does not preclude convictions for burglary with a battery and aggravated battery
  • finding that the collateral evidence was relevant to prove the defendant's intent, the absence of mistake, his relationship with the victim, and to dispute the defendant's defense
  • rejecting the argument that the appellant’s convictions for burglary with a battery and aggravated battery violated the prohibition against double jeopardy
  • trial court's ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is affirmed on appeal if a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepherd, Cortiã‘as, and Rothenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.