Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 12/4/1961

Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.

Citations

  • 368 U.S. 81
  • 82 S. Ct. 204
  • 7 L. Ed. 2d 147
  • 1961 U.S. LEXIS 1948

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “where the protesting carriers do not presently have the business, it would seem that the grant of it to a newcomer would have an adverse effect on them only in the unusual case”
  • \[T]he 1957 amendments changed the result of our decision in United States v. Contract Steel Carriers ... by giving the Commission power to limit the number of contracts which a contract carrier can maintain.\
  • ”[T]he 1957 amendments changed the result of our decision in United States v. Contract Steel Carriers ... by giving the Commission power to limit the number of contracts which a contract carrier can maintain.”
  • dissenting opinion of Mr, Justice Frankfurter
  • dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice Frankfurter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Douglas, Frankfurter, Harlan, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

128 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.