Churchill Truck Lines, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Rpd, Inc. And General Motors Corporation, Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding common carriers, whose sole motivation in case was economic self-interest, did not establish standing to contest commission’s grant of permit under National Environmental Policy Act
• economic injury alone not sufficient for standing under NEPA
• economic injury alone not sufficient for standing under NEPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).