Ingles v. Neiman Marcus Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that diabetic plaintiff who was merely required to maintain a “normal, good, healthy diet” was not substan- tially limited; plaintiff’s condition was substantially con- trolled with oral medication, and he did not have to take insulin
• “It is difficult to imagine that having to maintain a normal, healthy diet constitutes a disability.”
• Plaintiff was not disabled from walking despite numerous surgeries on both feet, the need to wear special types of footwear, and a restriction against extensive walking on hard surfaces

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).