Krikelis v. Vassar College

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff failed to allege that restrictions on eating caused by her diabetes significantly limited her ability to eat
• holding that diabetes is not a disability under the ADA
• finding that employee who suffered from diabetes was not substantially limited in a major life activity under the ADA but that triable issues of fact existed as to whether plaintiff had a cognizable disability under the NYSHRL
• finding a triable issue of fact existed regarding whether plaintiffs diabetes is a cognizable disability under the NYSHRL
• “[T]he Second Circuit has held that an employer is not required to provide every accommoda- tion a disabled employee may request, as long as the accommodation provided is reasonable.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).