In re Z.L.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4852
Syllabus
Parental rights; permanent custody; clear and convincing evidence; R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); best interests of the child; manifest weight of the evidence; sufficiency of the evidence; reasonable efforts. It was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the juvenile court granted permanent custody of the children to the agency. The juvenile court's findings under R.C. 2151.414(D)(2) were supported by competent and credible evidence. Mother was unable substantially remedy the conditions that caused the child to be placed outside the child's home, which included domestic-violence, mental-health, substance-abuse, and parenting concerns.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court· 1984-04-18· cited 4,990×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 193×
- In re N.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-01-29· cited 142×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 82×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re A.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-07· cited 9×
- In re A.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-24· cited 5×
- In re U.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-10· cited 5×
- In re T.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-12· cited 5×
- In re N.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-05· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.