In re N.C.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 2012
Syllabus
Permanent custody; R.C. 2151.414(B)(1); R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a); best interest; preponderance; R.C. 2151.414(D)(1); R.C. 2151.414(E); R.C. 2151.414(D)(2); clear and convincing; manifest weight; reasonable-efforts finding; due process; fundamental right; parent; ultimate welfare. Affirmed the juvenile court's judgment granting permanent custody of the minor child to the agency and terminating all parental rights. The juvenile court engaged in the proper analysis and made the requisite determinations under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1), (D)(1) and (E). The juvenile court's judgment was not against the manifest weight of the evidence, its reasonable-efforts finding was not erroneous, and father's fundamental right to parent his child was not violated.
Judges: S. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- In re A.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-12-23· cited 9×
- In re D.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-08· cited 7×
- In re T.T.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-08-01· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.