In re A.F.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4423
Syllabus
Permanent custody \reasonable efforts\ manifest weight best interest of the child unsworn statement or testimony. Trial court properly determined that public services children's agency made reasonable efforts to reunite Mother with her children where they developed a case plan and supervised visits with Mother for nearly three years. Juvenile court's decision to grant permanent custody of the children to CCDCFS was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence where there was clear and convincing evidence that the children had been in agency custody for nearly three years, Mother failed to remedy the conditions that required removal of the children, and permanent custody was in the children's best interests. Although each child is unique, the court's best interests analysis applied to all three children because they were close in age and had similar needs.
Judges: E.T. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-05-16· cited 14×
- In re T.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-03-07· cited 10×
- In re L.V.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-19· cited 6×
- In re T.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-06-12· cited 5×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-03-06· cited 2×
- In re A.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-15· cited 2×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-24· cited 1×
- In re Z.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-10-23· cited 1×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- State v. MorelandOhio Supreme Court· 1990-04-04· cited 702×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re CunninghamOhio Supreme Court· 1979-07-18· cited 599×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re HoffmanOhio Supreme Court· 2002-10-23· cited 193×
- State v. Hackett (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-17· cited 108×
- In re H.M.K.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 85×
- In re J.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-26· cited 82×
- In re L.D.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-03-23· cited 80×
- In re L.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-23· cited 61×
- In re J.P.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-30· cited 39×
- In re S.C.Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-06-28· cited 35×
- In re T.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-15· cited 27×
- In re J.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-04-17· cited 19×
- In re L.G.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-24· cited 19×
- In re S.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-08· cited 17×
- In re N.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-05-06· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.