In re A.L.
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5103
Syllabus
Permanent custody; best interest of the child; agency's efforts. Our review indicates the trial court's findings under R.C. 2151.414(E) are supported by clear and convincing evidence in the record and, therefore, the trial court appropriately found that L.A. could not \be placed with either parent within a reasonable time or should not be placed with either parent.\ R.C. 2151.414(E). The trial court also properly considered the statutory factors in determining that an award of permanent custody is in the child's best interest. Accordingly, the trial court's decision granting permanent custody to Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services (\CCDCFS\) is affirmed.
Judges: Sheehan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re HayesOhio Supreme Court· 1997-06-18· cited 613×
- In re Z.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2023-12-27· cited 335×
- In re M.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-12· cited 49×
- In re I.R.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-09-09· cited 12×
- In re V.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-04· cited 5×
- In re Jo.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-11-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.