Customs and Patent Appeals· 2/21/1980
In re Zahn
Citations
- 617 F.2d 261
- 204 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 988
- 1980 CCPA LEXIS 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a claim should not be rejected under 35 USC § 171 because only a portion of a tool was claimed as the design
- “We have in mind questions on which we can express no opinion because we are a court of review and do not pass on issues not raised.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.Supreme Court· 2016-12-06· cited 54×
- Door-Master Corporation, Plaintiff-Cross v. Yorktowne, Inc., and Conestoga Wood Specialties, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2001-07-10· cited 38×
- In Re John D. Webb, Jr., Roy Y. Hori, and George E. SimpsonFederal Circuit· 1990-10-11· cited 19×
- Best Lock Corporation v. Ilco Unican CorporationFederal Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 18×
- Metrokane, Inc. v. Wine EnthusiastS.D. New York· 2002-02-08· cited 12×
- Inre: Timothy OwensFederal Circuit· 2013-03-26· cited 10×
- In re SalmonFederal Circuit· 1983-04-25· cited 9×
- Larson v. Classic Corp.N.D. Illinois· 1988-04-12· cited 4×
- Advantek Marketing, Inc. v. Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co.Federal Circuit· 2018-08-01· cited 3×
- Norco Products, Inc. v. Mecca Development, Inc.D. Connecticut· 1985-10-09· cited 2×
- Auto. Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Techs., LLCE.D. Michigan· 2018-02-20· cited 1×
- Oxy Metal Industries Corp. v. Roper Corp.D. Maryland· 1984-01-18· cited 1×
- In Re ComiskeyFederal Circuit· 2009-01-13
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In re RubinfieldCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1959-05-22· cited 30×
- Application of Erwine Laverne and Estelle LaverneCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1966-03-10· cited 28×
- Application of StevensCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1949-04-12· cited 22×
- Application of Louis BlumCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-04-06· cited 14×
- In re ConleyCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1974-01-24· cited 12×
- Ripley v. Elson Glass Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio· 1892-03-12· cited 6×
- Application of John O. Hruby, JrCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1967-03-16· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.