Skip to main content
· 4/12/1988

Larson v. Classic Corp.

Citations

  • 683 F. Supp. 1202
  • 7 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1747
  • 1988 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3138
  • 1988 WL 35381

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that a feature’s visibility during normal use is “not a statutory requirement”: what matters is “whether that feature has some aesthetic, as opposed to purely functional or utilitarian, qualities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brian Barnett Duff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.