· 4/6/1967
Application of Louis Blum
Citations
- 374 F.2d 904
- 54 C.C.P.A. 1231
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- although design had “an appearance which is novel in the strictest sense of the word, the rejection here is not for want of novelty but for obviousness”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Worley, Rich, Smith, Almond
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.