Skip to main content
· 4/6/1967

Application of Louis Blum

Citations

  • 374 F.2d 904
  • 54 C.C.P.A. 1231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • although design had “an appearance which is novel in the strictest sense of the word, the rejection here is not for want of novelty but for obviousness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Worley, Rich, Smith, Almond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.