Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Article of manufacture is broad enough to embrace both a product sold to a consumer and a component of that product.” (internal quotations omitted)
• “Article of manufacture is broad enough to embrace both a product sold to a consumer and a component of that product” (internal quotations omitted)
• relying on expert’s explanation of an illustrated embodiment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Exmark Manufacturing Co. v. Briggs & Stratton Power Products Group, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2018-01-12· cited 120×
• CTB, Inc. v. Hog Slat, Inc.
  Fourth Circuit· 2020-03-27· cited 102×
• One-E-Way, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
  Federal Circuit· 2017-06-12· cited 29×
• Bodum USA, Incorporated v. A Top New Casting Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 2019-06-12· cited 29×
• Fastship, LLC v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2018-06-05· cited 26×
• Curver Luxembourg, Sarl v. Home Expressions Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2019-09-12· cited 15×
• Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Snap-On Inc.
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2017-09-22· cited 12×
• Automotive Body Parts Ass'n v. Ford Global Technologies, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2019-07-11· cited 11×
• Jackson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-01-09· cited 9×
• Iconics, Inc. v. Massaro
  D. Massachusetts· 2017-07-19· cited 8×
• TBL Licensing, LLC v. Katherine Vidal
  Fourth Circuit· 2024-04-15· cited 7×
• Penobscot Nation v. Mills
  First Circuit· 2017-06-30· cited 5×
• Advantek Marketing, Inc. v. Shanghai Walk-Long Tools Co.
  Federal Circuit· 2018-08-01· cited 3×
• DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY v. Burton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-12-21· cited 2×
• Sys., Inc. v. Nordock, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 2016-12-12· cited 2×
• Science Applications International Corp. v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2021-08-06

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Diamond v. Chakrabarty
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-16· cited 377×
• American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. Brogdex Co.
  Supreme Court· 1931-03-02· cited 100×
• Dobson v. Dornan
  Supreme Court· 1886-04-19· cited 71×
• Dobson v. Hartford Carpet Co.
  Supreme Court· 1885-04-20· cited 48×
• In re Zahn
  Customs and Patent Appeals· 1980-02-21· cited 17×
• Nordock, Inc. v. Systems Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2015-09-29· cited 5×