Customs and Patent Appeals· 6/7/1979
In re Wood
Citations
- 599 F.2d 1032
- 202 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 171
- 1979 CCPA LEXIS 243
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that reference in the patent’s specification to a field of art encompassing the alleged prior art supported a finding that the alleged prior art was within the inventor’s field of endeavor.
- confining the field of endeavor to the scope explicitly specified in the back ground of the invention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationFederal Circuit· 1983-07-25· cited 538×
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-09-30· cited 260×
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Federal Circuit· 1985-08-09· cited 176×
- Union Carbide Corporation v. American Can CompanyFederal Circuit· 1984-01-04· cited 175×
- In Re GPAC Inc.Federal Circuit· 1995-10-24· cited 148×
- In Re SchreiberFederal Circuit· 1997-12-17· cited 128×
- George W. Jurgens and Margaret M. Jurgens v. Timothy McKasy D/B/A Tonka Marketing and Cbk, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 1991-03-07· cited 113×
- In Re Carl D. ClayFederal Circuit· 1992-06-10· cited 93×
- In Re Hans OetikerFederal Circuit· 1992-10-13· cited 88×
- Shelcore, Inc., Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durham Industries, Inc., Appellee/cross-AppellantFederal Circuit· 1984-09-28· cited 77×
- In Re Diane M. DillonFederal Circuit· 1990-11-09· cited 74×
- In Re Alberto Lee BigioFederal Circuit· 2004-08-24· cited 64×
- In re KellerCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-02-12· cited 63×
- Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag v. Hantscho Commercial Products, Inc. And Rockwell Graphics Systems, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsFederal Circuit· 1994-06-01· cited 55×
- Pentec, Inc., and Bob Allen v. Graphic Controls Corp.Federal Circuit· 1985-11-01· cited 49×
- In Re Richard M. DeminskiFederal Circuit· 1986-07-08· cited 44×
- PBI Performance Products, Inc. v. NorFab Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-10-17· cited 25×
- In re ReuterCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1981-06-18· cited 24×
- Airbus S.A.S. v. Firepass CorporationFederal Circuit· 2019-11-08· cited 20×
- EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.D. Delaware· 1995-08-18· cited 16×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Application of Robert v. AntleCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1971-10-07· cited 37×
- In re MerchantCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-05-11· cited 20×
- Application of John S. BozekCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1969-11-06· cited 16×
- In re HolladayCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1978-10-26· cited 7×
- Application of George C. MapelsdenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1964-03-26· cited 5×
Other cases named In re Wood
134 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.
- In re WoodMichigan Supreme Court· 1890-07-02· cited 33×
- In Re WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1984-10-05· cited 32×
- In Re WoodN.D. Alabama· 1985-06-25· cited 18×
- In Re WoodTexas Supreme Court· 2004-07-09· cited 18×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2005-12-01· cited 17×
- In re WoodD. New Hampshire· 1922-09-12· cited 16×
- In Re WoodSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-09-28· cited 13×
- In Re WoodD. Idaho· 1990-12-11· cited 12×
- In re WoodSecond Circuit· 1921-12-14· cited 11×
- In Re WoodD. Kansas· 2009-07-27· cited 10×
- In Re WoodEleventh Circuit· 1989-03-02· cited 9×
- In Re WoodE.D. Tennessee· 1982-09-15· cited 9×
- In re WoodCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1946-04-01· cited 9×
- In Re WoodW.D. Kentucky· 1954-07-14· cited 8×
- In re WoodD. Oregon· 1899-06-29· cited 8×
- In Re WoodS.D. Ohio· 1988-09-13· cited 7×
- In Re WoodD. South Dakota· 1981-02-03· cited 7×
- In re WoodSixth Circuit· 1918-02-12· cited 7×
- In Re WoodS.D. Ohio· 2011-09-27· cited 6×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1915-12-30· cited 6×
- In Re WoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1990-07-13· cited 5×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-11-17· cited 5×
- In re WoodSupreme Court· 1891-05-11· cited 5×
- In re WoodS.D. New York· 1954-06-28· cited 5×
- In re WoodW.D. Kentucky· 1955-03-22· cited 5×
- In Re WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1939-09-12· cited 4×
- In re WoodNew York Supreme Court· 1868-06-01· cited 4×
- In re WoodS.D. New York· 1900-01-11· cited 4×
- In Re WoodD. Kansas· 1988-06-16· cited 3×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1904-07-01· cited 3×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1936-03-24· cited 3×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2007-05-08· cited 3×
- In re WoodNYC Family Court· 1978-06-07· cited 3×
- In re WoodMissouri Court of Appeals· 1950-07-13· cited 3×
- In re WoodD. Idaho· 2016-01-04· cited 3×
- In re WoodE.D. Tennessee· 1949-04-14· cited 3×
- In re WoodE.D. North Carolina· 1899-08-01· cited 3×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1906-03-07· cited 2×
- In re WoodNew York Surrogate's Court· 1886-12-15· cited 2×
- In re WoodNYC Family Court· 1973-07-05· cited 2×
- In re WoodD. Maryland· 2018-09-25· cited 2×
- In Re WoodD. Hawaii· 1986-12-16· cited 1×
- In Re WoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2011-09-14· cited 1×
- In re WoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 2011-06-22· cited 1×
- In re WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2011-08-30· cited 1×
- In re WoodNew York Surrogate's Court· 1883-02-15· cited 1×
- In re WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2003-03-12· cited 1×
- In re WoodSupreme Court of Louisiana· 1997-01-06· cited 1×
- In re WoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1992-10-30· cited 1×
- In re WoodS.D. Ohio· 1881-01-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.