In Re Carl D. Clay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he purposes of both the invention and the prior art are important in de- termining whether the reference is reasonably pertinent to the problem the invention attempts to solve.”
• “[T]he purposes of both the invention and the prior art are important in de- termining whether the reference is reasonably pertinent to the problem the invention attempts to solve.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).