Federal Circuit· 11/9/1990
In Re Diane M. Dillon
Citations
- 919 F.2d 688
- 16 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1897
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19768
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that prima facie obviousness is established “where the prior art gives reason or motivation to make the claimed compositions”
- “[S]tructural similarity between claimed and prior art subject matter, proved by combining references or other- wise, where the prior art gives reason or motivation to make the claimed compositions, creates a prima facie case of obviousness . . . .”
- “[A] compound and all of its properties are inseparable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nies, Rich, Cowen, Newman, Archer, Mayer, Michel, Plager, Lourie, Clevenger, Rader
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BradfordCalifornia Supreme Court· 1997-07-14· cited 756×
- Cross Medical Products, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2005-09-30· cited 260×
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Federal Circuit· 1991-05-20· cited 256×
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-05-13· cited 168×
- Abbott Laboratories v. Sandoz, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2008-10-21· cited 141×
- Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2016-10-07· cited 124×
- Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. v. Alphapharm Pty., Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2007-06-28· cited 114×
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Calgene, Inc., Defendant-CrossFederal Circuit· 1999-09-24· cited 106×
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-12-26· cited 97×
- Kao Corporation and the Andrew Jergens Company, Plaintiffs-Cross v. Unilever United States, Inc. And Conopco, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2006-03-21· cited 90×
- Altana Pharma AG v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2009-05-14· cited 83×
- Eisai Co. Ltd. v. Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2008-07-21· cited 72×
- Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. And Merck & Co., Inc. v. Danbury Pharmacal, Inc., Schein Pharmaceutical, Inc., and Marsam Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2000-11-03· cited 66×
- In Re Pravin L. Soni, Ceinwen Rowlands, Larry Edwards and Mark WartenbergFederal Circuit· 1995-05-09· cited 62×
- OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. Sandoz, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2012-05-07· cited 59×
- In Re Michael Geisler, Rudolf Kotter-Faulhaber, Susanne Wuerz and Michael JungFederal Circuit· 1997-07-07· cited 54×
- Genetics Institute, LLC v. Novartis Vaccines & Diagnostics, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2011-08-23· cited 53×
- In Re Thomas F. Deuel, Yue-Sheng Li, Ned R. Siegel and Peter G. MilnerFederal Circuit· 1995-03-28· cited 53×
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Company v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Federal Circuit· 2014-06-12· cited 52×
- Aventis Pharma Deutschland GmbH v. Lupin, Ltd.Federal Circuit· 2007-09-11· cited 41×
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 3,371×
- Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court· 1986-01-14· cited 1,638×
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court· 1932-04-11· cited 745×
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court· 1966-02-21· cited 544×
- Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Company, Harris Press and Shear Division, Commercial Metals CompanyFederal Circuit· 1984-03-21· cited 229×
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court· 1980-06-27· cited 219×
- Dawson Chemical Co. v. Rohm & Haas Co.Supreme Court· 1980-09-17· cited 198×
- Titanium Metals Corporation of America v. Donald W. Banner, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksFederal Circuit· 1985-11-07· cited 148×
- Robert L. Jones and Labrado, Inc. v. Alex HardyFederal Circuit· 1984-02-08· cited 130×
- Application of Viktor PapeschCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1963-03-20· cited 126×
- In Re Frank N. Piasecki and Donald N. MeyersFederal Circuit· 1984-10-17· cited 96×
- In Re Walter Kaslow and Uniform Product Code Council, Inc. (Uppc), IntervenorFederal Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 95×
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1962-04-13· cited 89×
- In re WertheimCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-08-26· cited 89×
- In Re Merck & Co., IncFederal Circuit· 1986-09-08· cited 82×
- In re WoodCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1979-06-07· cited 80×
- In re RinehartCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1976-03-11· cited 65×
- Application of Aubrey A. LarsenCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1961-10-24· cited 55×
- In Re Gary E. GEIGERFederal Circuit· 1987-04-01· cited 52×
Other cases named In Re Diane M. Dillon
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.