Skip to main content
Second Circuit· 9/24/1998

In Re Williams

Citations

  • 224 B.R. 523
  • 1998 WL 665403

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming bankruptcy court's award of attorney’s fees upon finding that creditor’s position was not substantially justified
  • comparing the text of the two statutes and quoting the Senate Report on § 523(d) which states that it incorporates the standard of the EAJA
  • describing a totality of the circumstances approach as consistent with an abuse of discretion review
  • “We hold that the creditor must be substantially justified at all times through trial to be insulated from paying attorneys’ fees under § 523(d).”
  • the three factors help focus the bankruptcy court’s inquiry on the appropriate aspects of the complaint
  • “It was Congress’ intent that determination of § 523(d) awards be based upon the EAJA standard.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Conrad, Ninfo II, and Gallet, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.