Heritage Pacific Financial, LLC v. Montano (In Re Montano)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the bankruptcy court concluded that Heritage had not proven actual reliance, an essential element to prove for an exception to discharge under 523(a)(2)(B), . . . it follows that Heritage did not show that its position was substantially justified.”
• “Because Montano’s 27 28 1 motion for reconsideration was filed within fourteen days after entry of the Summary 2 Judgment Order, the motion should be treated as one to alter or amend the Summary 3 Judgment Order under Rule 9023, which incorporates Civil Rule 59(e).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).