Skip to main content
· 4/27/1998

Prebor v. Collins (In Re I Don't Trust)

Citations

  • 143 F.3d 1
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 8044
  • 32 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 686
  • 1998 WL 191142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “attorney seeking approval” of fee application pursuant to Section 330 must establish the propriety of “each dollar for each hour above zero”
  • “[W]e are not required to accept as true 7 conclusory allegations which are contradicted by documents referred to in the complaint.”
  • “That the hearing did not involve live testimony is beside any relevant point, for Prebor never specifically requested that the bankruptcy court hold an evidentiary hearing.”
  • “That the hearing did not involve live testimony is beside any relevant point, for Prebor never specifically requested that the bankruptcy court hold an evidentiary hearing.”
  • “The words ‘after notice and hearing’ denote notice and an opportunity for a hearing as appropriate in the particular circumstances, but a hearing—much less an evidentiary hearing—is not required in every instance.”
  • correctional officer’s evangelizing activities did not constitute state 4 endorsement of religion because activities were not sanctioned in any way by policy of 5 correctional facility or staff and were short-term and sporadic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Boudin, Lynch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.