Skip to main content
· 8/19/1997

Neal & Company, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 121 F.3d 683
  • 41 Cont. Cas. Fed. 77,153
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 21877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing that “a party which prevails only in part may nonetheless qualify for an award of costs”
  • “The modified total cost method is simply the total cost method, adjusted for any deficiencies in the plaintiff's proof in satisfying the requirements of the total cost method.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lourie, Rader, Schall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.