Cutera Securities Litigation v. Conners

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that cautionary language warning that Cutera’s 14 “‘ability to continue increasing sales performance worldwide’ could cause variance in the results” 15 is sufficient
• holding that essentially similar warning language was sufficient to trigger the PSLRA’s safe harbor
• holding that 16 incomplete disclosures about earnings projections fell within the PSLRA safe harbor
• holding that the safe harbor provides two independent grounds for protection
• rejecting as puffery the statement \[ w ] e believe that our track record for enrollment and revenue growth is attributable to ...\
• finding sufficient cautionary language in a verbal disclaimer on a teleconference that \factors like [the company's] 'ability to continue increasing sales performance worldwide' could cause variance in the results.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).