Skip to main content
· 2/29/1980

Regina (Rega) Jablon v. Dean Witter & Co., and Sydney Turner

Citations

  • 614 F.2d 677
  • 54 A.L.R. Fed. 1
  • 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 20055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court must assess a complaint’s 22 allegations when determining whether to toll the statute of limitations
  • noting that dismissal may be granted “if 7 the assertions of the complaint, read with the required liberality, would not permit the 8 plaintiff to prove that the statute was tolled”
  • noting that a Rule 12(b)(6) motion can be 5 granted based on the statute of limitations if “the running of the statute is apparent on the face of 6 the complaint”
  • finding no private right of action 5 for violations of stock association rules
  • no implied private right of action for violation of “know your customer” and “suitability” rules
  • “If the running of the statute 19 is apparent on the face of the complaint, the defense may be raised in a motion to dismiss.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Hug, Skopil

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.