Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether information was in fact provided to analysts by company is a question for the trier of fact
• revenues and profits “leave[ ] us well positioned to fund our growth in fiscal 1989 and beyond” held actionable
• allegation of liability for analysts’ statements upheld where complaint alleged generally that the information in specific analysts’ reports was based in part on information provided by defendants
• same for analysts’ conclusions “based in large part on information provided by management”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).