N.D. California· 3/28/2010
In re TFT-LCD (Flat Panel) Antitrust Litigation
Citations
- 267 F.R.D. 291
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38122
- 2010 WL 1417896
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that, in antitrust cases, individual damages “are likely to be too small to justify litigation, but a class action would offer those with small claims the opportunity for meaningful redress”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Illston
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Pamela Brennan v. Concord Efs, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-07-12· cited 49×
- Herrera v. LCS Financial Services Corp.N.D. California· 2011-06-01· cited 34×
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict of Columbia· 2012-07-13· cited 32×
- Nitsch v. DreamWorks Animation SKG Inc.N.D. California· 2016-05-25· cited 17×
- State v. AU Optronics Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-05· cited 12×
- Gomez v. Rossi Concrete, Inc.S.D. California· 2010-09-22· cited 10×
- In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2013-04-05· cited 10×
- Kosta v. Del Monte Foods, Inc.N.D. California· 2015-07-30· cited 10×
- In re Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products Antitrust LitigationC.D. California· 2011-07-25· cited 5×
- Bias v. Wells Fargo & Co.N.D. California· 2015-12-17· cited 5×
- In re: Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust LitigationN.D. California· 2015-07-08· cited 1×
- State Of Washington, App. v. Lg Display Co., Ltd., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2014-05-05
Cites
43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court· 1982-06-14· cited 4,068×
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court· 1985-07-01· cited 3,595×
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 3,301×
- Illinois Brick Co. v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 1,382×
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 1,381×
- Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court· 1979-06-11· cited 1,277×
- Staton v. Boeing Co.Ninth Circuit· 2003-04-29· cited 1,028×
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisNinth Circuit· 1992-09-28· cited 950×
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.Supreme Court· 1962-06-25· cited 924×
- Blackie v. BarrackNinth Circuit· 1975-09-25· cited 871×
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1972-03-01· cited 658×
- SEDIMA, S.P.R.L., Appellant, v. IMREX COMPANY, INC., Gidon Armon and Jacob Armon, AppelleesSecond Circuit· 1984-07-25· cited 220×
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S. A.Supreme Court· 2004-06-14· cited 212×
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationS.D. New York· 1996-11-26· cited 208×
- In Re High Fructose Corn Syrup Antitrust Litigation. Appeal of a & W Bottling, Inc.Seventh Circuit· 2002-08-05· cited 192×
- Alliance to End Repression v. James M. Rochford, Etc., American Civil Liberties Union v. Griffin B. BellSeventh Circuit· 1977-11-22· cited 155×
- Deiter v. Microsoft Corp.Fourth Circuit· 2006-02-07· cited 155×
- Yokoyama v. Midland National Life InsuranceNinth Circuit· 2010-02-08· cited 151×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 2002-09-05· cited 138×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.