Skip to main content
D. Connecticut· 3/28/2014

In re Trilegiant Corp.

Citations

  • 11 F. Supp. 3d 82
  • 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42573
  • 2014 WL 1315244

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the ARL \only provides a private cause of action for customers who are harmed in California\
  • \Hub-and-spoke enterprises have long been held by courts in this circuit to be insufficient as a matter of law to constitute the requisite enterprise for a RICO violation.\
  • therefore granting defendant’s motion to strike CUTPA nationwide class action
  • referring to doctrine as \ 'storm clouds' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bryant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

100 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In re Trilegiant Corp.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.