In Re Spiridon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an examination solely of the events relating to the misdemeanor “would effectively eliminate the individualized examination that McBride mandates”
• focusing on the small amount of money stolen by respondent as well as his lack of venal motive
• focusing on the small amount of money stolen by respondent as well as his lack of venal motive
• rejecting a purely elements-based analysis to determine if an attorney's crime reflects moral turpitude on the facts
• rejecting a purely elements-based analysis to determine if an attorney’s crime reflects moral turpitude on the facts
• rejecting as unduly narrow approach that permitted “examination 36 solely of the events directly relating to the crime itself, that is, how the crime was committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).