Skip to main content
· 7/11/1995

Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Gillingham

Citations

  • 896 P.2d 656
  • 126 Wash. 2d 454

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[u]nlike the other rules governing conflicts of interest, the prohibition on testamentary gifts which are drafted by the lawyer-beneficiary does not include an exception when the client gives informed consent”
  • finding negligence where the attorney complied roughly with the spirit of the RPCs and evidence of the attorney’s negligent state of mind was apparent in the record
  • 60 day suspension for obtaining loan from client without proper safeguards, and drafting will in which lawyer is named as beneficiary
  • 60 day suspension for obtaining loan from client without proper safeguards, and drafting will in which lawyer is named as beneficiary
  • emphasizing the importance of documenting client transactions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.