Washington Supreme Court· 12/20/2007

In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Holcomb

Citations

162 Wash. 2d 563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with \client\
declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with \client\
declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with “client”
six month suspension for inappropriate financial dealings with client, no prior discipline
6 month suspension for inappropriate financial dealings with client, no prior discipline
attorney found to have acted with “knowledge” because he “should have known that a conflict existed when he requested the loans from his client without 15 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. In re Cross (Geoffrey Colburn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairhurst, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.