In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Holcomb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with \client\
• declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with \client\
• declined to apply Standards std. 9.22(g) where attorney claimed he did not engage in transactions with “client”
• six month suspension for inappropriate financial dealings with client, no prior discipline
• 6 month suspension for inappropriate financial dealings with client, no prior discipline
• attorney found to have acted with “knowledge” because he “should have known that a conflict existed when he requested the loans from his client without 15 For the current opinion, go to https://www.lexisnexis.com/clients/wareports/. In re Cross (Geoffrey Colburn

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).