In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Stansfield

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We do not require proof of state of mind relating to the consequences; it is sufficient if the facts support a conclusion that the lawyer either knew or should have known that adverse consequences would occur.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Preszler
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 38×
• In Re Marshall
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 37×
• In Re Disc. Proceeding Against Preszler
  Washington Supreme Court· 2010-06-17· cited 36×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-10-01· cited 36×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Eugster
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 24×
• In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Cramer
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 20×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cramer
  Washington Supreme Court· 2008-12-11· cited 20×
• In re Melvin Fink
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-04-15· cited 16×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against McGrath
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-07-12· cited 15×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Jackson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-04-17· cited 8×
• In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Eugster
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-06-11· cited 4×
• In re PRB Docket No. 2012.155
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2015-04-03· cited 4×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Young Suk Oh
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-12-20· cited 1×
• In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cross
  Washington Supreme Court· 2021-12-23· cited 1×
• In re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Jackson
  Washington Supreme Court· 2014-04-17
• In re Hodge - (
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2017-12-29

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Eriks v. Denver
  Washington Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 138×
• Michael Crisp v. Jack R. Duckworth, Warden
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-09-14· cited 112×
• Disciplinary Proceeding v. Noble
  Washington Supreme Court· 1983-07-28· cited 103×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-10· cited 86×
• Disciplinary Proceeding Against Marshall
  Washington Supreme Court· 2007-05-10· cited 83×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Carmick
  Washington Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 75×
• In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Poole
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-01-05· cited 67×
• In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Cohen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-01-15· cited 63×
• IN re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Cohen
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-01-15· cited 60×
• In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-01-26· cited 58×
• Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Guarnero
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-08· cited 56×
• In Re Disciplinary Proc. Against Longacre
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-11-10· cited 55×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Guarnero
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-07-08· cited 55×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Longacre
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-11-10· cited 52×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Schwimmer
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 51×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against VanDerbeek
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-11-24· cited 50×
• In Re Disciplinary Proceeding Against Vanderbeek
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-11-24· cited 49×
• Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Schwimmer
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-03-17· cited 48×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Haley
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-01-26· cited 46×
• In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Christopher
  Washington Supreme Court· 2005-02-03· cited 42×