In Re Gildea

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that text of DR 9-101(C)(3) makes clear that requirement that lawyer render all “appropriate” accounts is not preconditioned on client first asking for an accounting
• applying factor when lawyer who violated several rules had acted throughout in good faith and had attempted to further his client’s best interests at all times
• applying factor when lawyer who violated several rules had acted throughout in good faith and had attempted to further his client’s best interests at all times
• relying on testimony of an accused to establish a client’s prior consent
• four-month suspension, when the lawyer failed to account for client property and engaged in a self-interest conflict and a business transaction with a client
• testimony of accused lawyer, if court deems it credible, is sufficient to establish facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).