Skip to main content
· 7/29/2010

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hostetter

Citations

  • 348 Or. 574
  • 238 P.3d 13
  • 2010 Ore. LEXIS 558

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining “actual injury” as the “actual harm to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession”
  • looking to the commentary to the model rule for its persuasive value when an Oregon rule is identical to the model rule
  • cautioning against conflating “adversity” with “injury” for purposes of adversity requirement
  • cautioning against conflating “adversity” with “injury” for purposes of adversity requirement
  • although case matching in lawyer discipline cases is an “inexact science,” the court’s case law can “provide some guidance” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • so stating; focus is whether respective interests were “adverse from the outset,” not whether client injured later as result of a conflict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.