· 7/29/2010
In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hostetter
Citations
- 348 Or. 574
- 238 P.3d 13
- 2010 Ore. LEXIS 558
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining “actual injury” as the “actual harm to a client, the public, the legal system, or the profession”
- looking to the commentary to the model rule for its persuasive value when an Oregon rule is identical to the model rule
- cautioning against conflating “adversity” with “injury” for purposes of adversity requirement
- cautioning against conflating “adversity” with “injury” for purposes of adversity requirement
- although case matching in lawyer discipline cases is an “inexact science,” the court’s case law can “provide some guidance” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- so stating; focus is whether respective interests were “adverse from the outset,” not whether client injured later as result of a conflict
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.