Meza v. Truman (In Re Meza)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that a modification motion should have been heard even after the debtors had made all their payments
• adopting the approach taken by a growing number of courts that a unanticipated, substantial change is not a prerequisite to modification of a Chapter 13 plan
• “Modification [under 1329] is based on the premise that, during the life of the plan, circumstances may change, and parties should have the ability to modify the plan accordingly.”
• “The decision whether to modify a chapter 13 plan is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
• “Modification [under 1329] is based on the premise that, during the life of the plan, circumstances may change, and parties should have the ability to modify the plan accordingly.”
• agreeing with Witkowski and Barbosa

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).