In Re Quevedo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evaluating the legislative history of the hanging paragraph and determining that it “protects only purchase money security interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Duke
  W.D. Kentucky· 2006-07-12· cited 29×
• In Re Trejos
  D. Nevada· 2006-09-25· cited 28×
• Sovereign Bank, F.S.B. v. Finnegan (In Re Finnegan)
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-11-30· cited 19×
• In Re Hall
  D. Arizona· 2007-10-02· cited 10×
• In Re Littlefield
  D. Maine· 2008-05-20· cited 6×
• In Re Tanguay
  E.D. Tennessee· 2010-04-14· cited 3×
• In re McPhilamy
  S.D. Texas· 2017-01-31· cited 2×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Lamie v. United States Trustee
  Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 1,956×
• Sunahara v. Burchard (In Re Sunahara)
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-27· cited 75×
• In Re Johnson
  M.D. North Carolina· 2006-02-02· cited 51×
• In Re Carver
  S.D. Georgia· 2006-03-06· cited 46×
• In Re Montoya
  D. Utah· 2006-04-10· cited 41×
• In Re Horn
  M.D. Alabama· 2006-02-23· cited 31×
• In Re Sounakhene
  S.D. California· 2000-06-26· cited 31×
• In Re Kevin J. Doser in Re Laura E. Doser, Judith M. Scott v. United States Trustee
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-06-17· cited 25×