In Re Sherwin-Williams Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that any “reasonable person would understand” that a judge’s criticism of law he was “obligated to follow” did not jeopardize his impartiality
• “That [a person] focusing only on one aspect of the story[] might perceive a risk of bias is irrelevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).