· 9/8/2010
In Re Specht
Citations
- 622 F.3d 697
- 96 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1773
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 18740
- 2010 WL 3494676
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- courts are not forced to succumb to “easy manipulation” of recusal rules by mandating that judge step aside when plaintiff names judge as defendant
- “Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view, even if the litigants strongly prefer secrecy”
- courts are not forced to succumb to “easy manipulation” of recusal rules by mandating that judge step aside when plaintiff names judge as defendant
- “Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view, even if the litigants strongly prefer secrecy”
- Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view, even if the litigants strongly prefer secrecy, unless a statute, rule, or privilege justifies confidentiality
- “Documents that affect the disposition of federal litigation are presumptively open to public view, even if the litigants strongly prefer secrecy, unless a statute, rule, or privilege justifies confidentiality.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Kanne, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.