Second Circuit· 9/17/2008
In Re Basciano
Citations
- 542 F.3d 950
- 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 19683
- 2008 WL 4250051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a death threat against a judge did not require recusal
- noting that to issue a writ of mandamus, petitioner “must clearly and indisputably demonstrate that the district court abused its discretion. Absent such a showing, mandamus will not lie.”
- finding no error in refusal to recuse in part because the court did nothing, other than ruling against the defendant, that would “reveal partiality”
- listing cases concluding that recusal is not ordinarily required when a judge faces threats
- finding no appear- ance of partiality in the judge’s actions after a defendant’s threat when the judge acted “meticulously” and carefully 18 No. 21-1220 explained his reasoning
- “The district judge has discretion in the first instance to determine whether to disqualify himself.’”’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kearse, Leval, Sack
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. StewartSecond Circuit· 2009-12-23· cited 157×
- United States v. William CordovaD.C. Circuit· 2015-11-24· cited 50×
- In Re Sherwin-Williams Co.Seventh Circuit· 2010-06-07· cited 40×
- Da Silva Moore v. Publicis Groupe & MSL GroupS.D. New York· 2012-06-15· cited 32×
- State v. Aakash A. Dalal (075325)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2015-06-17· cited 30×
- Gallop v. CheneySecond Circuit· 2011-07-07· cited 25×
- State v. RiordanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2009-05-21· cited 18×
- United States v. David WalshSeventh Circuit· 2022-08-24· cited 16×
- In Re BergeronSeventh Circuit· 2011-03-04· cited 12×
- Battle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2016-03-21· cited 12×
- United States v. BealeEighth Circuit· 2009-07-23· cited 10×
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerS.D. New York· 2011-05-09· cited 10×
- United States v. Apple Inc. Texas v. Apple Inc.Second Circuit· 2015-05-28· cited 10×
- Backer v. Cooperatieve Rabobank U.A.S.D. Illinois· 2018-09-18· cited 8×
- United States v. JordanS.D. New York· 2008-12-29· cited 6×
- United States v. Beltran-Leyva (Guzman Loera)Second Circuit· 2022-01-25· cited 6×
- State v. ZornSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-08-09· cited 4×
- United States v. CorbinD. Maine· 2011-11-14· cited 4×
- United States v. MohamedE.D. New York· 2015-05-01· cited 1×
- United States v. IsraelSecond Circuit· 2009-06-19· cited 1×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- United States v. HollandNinth Circuit· 2008-03-17· cited 1,335×
- United States v. Ruth StudleyNinth Circuit· 1986-02-26· cited 671×
- United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonTenth Circuit· 1993-08-16· cited 437×
- United States v. Kon Yu-Leung, Also Known as Johnny Kon, John RuotoloSecond Circuit· 1995-04-07· cited 215×
- United States v. Michael Lovaglia, Martin Clune and Peter PavlisakSecond Circuit· 1992-01-22· cited 189×
- United States v. John F. GrismoreTenth Circuit· 1977-11-04· cited 123×
- United States v. Harry Greenspan, AKA Alfred A. Lugo, AKA Alfred Anthony Lugo, AKA Alex Lugo, AKA Alex StoneTenth Circuit· 1994-06-06· cited 122×
- In Re Drexel Burnham Lambert IncorporatedSecond Circuit· 1988-11-15· cited 114×
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. TurnbowSupreme Court· 1989-06-05· cited 102×
- United States v. Robert J. Amico, Richard N. AmicoSecond Circuit· 2007-05-23· cited 80×
- Rachel Ehrenfeld v. Khalid Salim Bin Mahfouz, Docket No. 06-2228-CvSecond Circuit· 2007-06-08· cited 63×
- Esperanza Barragan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-10-06· cited 25×
- United States v. BascianoE.D. New York· 2005-05-05· cited 19×
- Basciano v. LindsayE.D. New York· 2008-01-14· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.