J.S. v. Whetzel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the Board’s reasons for finding a lack of motivation to combine were not supported by sub- stantial evidence “[u]nder applicable legal principles”
• noting that motivations to combine are legally insufficient where they are asserted in a generic, conclusory manner
• determining that the Board’s reasons for finding a lack of motivation to combine were not supported by sub- stantial evidence “[u]nder applicable legal principles”
• cautioning against “break[ing] down a phrase and giv[ing] it an interpretation that is merely the sum of its parts”
• cautioning against “break[ing] down a phrase and giv[ing] it an interpretation that is merely the sum of its parts”
• “It’s not necessary to show that a com- bination is the best option, only that it be a suitable op- tion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).