Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1/4/2019

Commonwealth v. Lehman

Citations

201 A.3d 1279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant could not be sentenced to pay costs of prosecution associated with resentencing following Miller and Montgomery
“We hold that the trial court lacked the authority to order Appellant to pay the costs associated with the resentencing necessitated by evolution of constitutional law.”
challenge to trial court’s authority to impose costs implicated legality -7- J-A24036-19 of the sentence, “and, thus, [the appellant] was not required . . . to raise the issue before the trial court”
“Because [the defendant] challenges the trial court’s authority to impose costs as part of its resentencing order, we conclude that the [defendant’s] claim implicates the legality of his sentence and, thus, he was not required to include a [Pa.R.A.P. 2119(f

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lazarus, Olson, Musmanno

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.