Skip to main content

In Re Selena O.

Citations

  • 934 A.2d 860
  • 104 Conn. App. 635
  • 2007 Conn. App. LEXIS 434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ‘‘[i]f the court’s conclusions or findings of fact rest on speculation rather than on sufficient evidence, they are clearly erroneous’’
  • “[i]f the court’s conclu- sions or findings of fact rest on speculation rather than on sufficient evidence, they are clearly erroneous”
  • conclusions that rest on speculation are erroneous

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harper, Lavine, Mihalakos

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In Re Selena O.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.