Skip to main content
· 3/17/2009

Papic v. Burke

Citations

  • 965 A.2d 633
  • 113 Conn. App. 198
  • 2009 Conn. App. LEXIS 89
  • 2009 WL 619022

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[a]bsent a showing by the plaintiff to suggest that the defendant did not read the administrative record prior to issuing the final order, we take the defendant at his word”
  • appellate courts have authority to take judicial notice of Superior Court files
  • ‘‘it is not permissible to use [an] appendix [to an appellate brief] either to set forth argument or to evade the thirty-five page limitation provided in Practice Book § 67-3 and already met by the [appellant’s] brief’’
  • ‘it is not permissible to use [an] appendix [to an appellate brief] either to set forth argument or to evade the thirty-five page limitation provided in Practice Book § 67-3 and already met by the [appellant’s] brief’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Gruendel, Robinson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.