Echavarria v. National Grange Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that trial court’s finding of actual notice was clearly erroneous and directing judgment consistent with lack of notice
• \[w]e have consistently held that we do not render advisory opinions\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
• “[A] contract is regarded as made at the time and place that the letter of acceptance is put into the possession of the postal, service.”
• “[W]e have consistently held that we do not render advisory opinions. . . . [W]here the question presented is purely academic, we must refuse to entertain the appeal.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
• “[wjehave consistently held that we do not render advisory opinions” [internal quotation marks omitted]
• whether notice of cancellation of policy was sent subject to clearly erroneous review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).