Skip to main content

In re Martin

Citations

  • 316 Mich. App. 73
  • 896 N.W.2d 452
  • 2016 Mich. App. LEXIS 1253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that other jurisdictions have refused to apply the exclusionary rule in child protective proceedings because it may hinder the state’s interest in protecting children
  • noting that other jurisdictions have refused to apply the exclusionary rule in child protective proceedings because it may hinder the state’s interest in protecting children

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borrello, Murphy, Saad

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.